Reviews
Anonymous
David Wessel was very unethical, manipulating his children, speaking ill of his parents, and achieving his goals in court. Here is what happened in a case that I know well. Wessel was designated as the representative of the child in the trial over the visit. After the trial, Wessel approached the two parties with the idea of boxing. This was done by creating a "therapy" session with a social worker known to Wessel. Children are taken from one parent to a therapist and discuss "issues" and "concerns" about the other parent. At that time, social workers decided to write a letter that Wessel could submit in court. The letter details concerns the child has about other parents and puts them in a bad position. Wessel knew that his parents were not speaking at that time. He approached one party, but the party refused to follow the plan. He later brought the same proposal to the other party. Of course everything was written "Speak to the Child", and Wessel was always making excuses that he was not manipulating the child. No, the other parent, the child said...
Why does it solve the case based on its merits when children are told about their parents and disposed of?
Child psychologists treat children emotionally abusive. Clearly, it creates bad feelings between children and parents, which leads to alienation of parents. Everything was done behind the scenes in the form of representing the best interests of the children. a nasty misdeed Keep away from your parents!
